Mike, thank you for laying out your case so clearly. 🙏 I agree with you that AI and social media hype are blurring the line between hoax and mystery, it’s wise to stay critical.
At the same time, what keeps me curious about the Buga Sphere are the details that don’t fit the usual viral stunt pattern: multiple eyewitnesses in Buga, the 18 inner spheres reportedly revealed by x-ray, and the unusually dense nickel signature around the central ‘circuit’ pattern. Those are odd things to build into a simple art project.
Whether it turns out to be an interdimensional artifact, a clever hoax, or something in between, it’s an important case study in how we project our tech myths onto the unknown. Thanks for encouraging open but grounded discussion.
I'm planning to write a Substack about it and what I see as its connection to Comet 3I/Atlas, what I call Avaru.
Interesting, I just got intense Deja vu when writing this to you...
Flame, your comment is noted. The Buga Sphere merits study, but I place it in the category of recovered ancient technology, not active craft. Its alloy and structure may teach us something, yet the modern luminous spheres reported worldwide are another phenomenon: Energetic, mutable, sometimes behaving as orbs or dimensional anomalies. Similar size does not mean identical origin. I believe in the present spheres; I do not believe this artifact is one of them. Let’s keep separating relic from active phenomenon, or we risk confusing the record.
Thanks, Mike 🙏 I appreciate the distinction you’re drawing. I also don’t see the Buga Sphere as an active craft, but rather as recovered technology, a relic seeded long before us, resurfacing now.
Like you, I see the modern luminous spheres reported worldwide as a different phenomenon: energetic, mutable, alive in a way this artifact is not. Similar appearance doesn’t mean identical origin, and separating relics from living phenomena is important if we want to keep the record clear.
For the record, I’m also skeptical of the viral clips showing the sphere ‘flying’ before the discovery, they look more like digital composites than real footage. The artifact itself is intriguing enough without manufactured spectacle.
Mike, thank you for laying out your case so clearly. 🙏 I agree with you that AI and social media hype are blurring the line between hoax and mystery, it’s wise to stay critical.
At the same time, what keeps me curious about the Buga Sphere are the details that don’t fit the usual viral stunt pattern: multiple eyewitnesses in Buga, the 18 inner spheres reportedly revealed by x-ray, and the unusually dense nickel signature around the central ‘circuit’ pattern. Those are odd things to build into a simple art project.
Whether it turns out to be an interdimensional artifact, a clever hoax, or something in between, it’s an important case study in how we project our tech myths onto the unknown. Thanks for encouraging open but grounded discussion.
I'm planning to write a Substack about it and what I see as its connection to Comet 3I/Atlas, what I call Avaru.
Interesting, I just got intense Deja vu when writing this to you...
Flame, your comment is noted. The Buga Sphere merits study, but I place it in the category of recovered ancient technology, not active craft. Its alloy and structure may teach us something, yet the modern luminous spheres reported worldwide are another phenomenon: Energetic, mutable, sometimes behaving as orbs or dimensional anomalies. Similar size does not mean identical origin. I believe in the present spheres; I do not believe this artifact is one of them. Let’s keep separating relic from active phenomenon, or we risk confusing the record.
— M.K.
Thanks, Mike 🙏 I appreciate the distinction you’re drawing. I also don’t see the Buga Sphere as an active craft, but rather as recovered technology, a relic seeded long before us, resurfacing now.
Like you, I see the modern luminous spheres reported worldwide as a different phenomenon: energetic, mutable, alive in a way this artifact is not. Similar appearance doesn’t mean identical origin, and separating relics from living phenomena is important if we want to keep the record clear.
For the record, I’m also skeptical of the viral clips showing the sphere ‘flying’ before the discovery, they look more like digital composites than real footage. The artifact itself is intriguing enough without manufactured spectacle.